Skip to content
03 / THE METHOD

A claim is the starting point.

Define the decision. Examine the assumptions. Test the system. Preserve the evidence.

01 / WORKING METHOD

A method built for scrutiny.

01

Define the decision

Specify the technical assertion, intended use, decision owner and consequences of an incorrect conclusion.

02

Describe the system boundary

State observed outputs, dependency structure, interfaces, operating conditions and exclusions.

03

Design the test

Specify baseline, metrics, data provenance, versioning, acceptance criteria and meaningful negative controls.

04

Challenge the result

Test alternative explanations, leakage, confounding, edge conditions and plausible failure pathways.

05

Preserve the record

Document protocols, code and data references where permissible, outputs, discrepancies and relevant limitations.

06

Calibrate the conclusion

Separate supported findings from indeterminate or contradicted claims; state the next evidence requirement.

PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE

ACCOUNTABILITY IS PART OF THE METHOD.

Technical findings become useful when their basis, limits, and associated responsibilities are clear to the decision-maker.

01

Defined responsibilities

Identify the decision owner, scientific lead, contributors and review process in the agreed scope.

02

Controlled disclosure

Determine what information is necessary, how it may be used and when separate confidentiality arrangements are required.

03

Traceable conclusions

Separate observed findings, assumptions and unresolved questions; do not present exploration as certification.

04

Responsible escalation

If the question exceeds the agreed evidence, expertise or scope, describe the gap and agree the next step before expanding the work.

THE PRINCIPLE
An uncertainty made visible is a risk that can be managed.
02 / REPRODUCIBILITY

Evidence should outlast the presentation.

A useful evidence record allows a qualified reviewer to understand what was done, how conclusions were reached, and where the inference stops. Negative findings remain part of the record.

Examine the research record